I received a 'neutral' rating for including CTOs when her profile stated that she didn't want them. My problem is that I apparently can't tell a difference on some of them! Some are EASY to spot...slick on the front, kinda thin and from places like Uzbekistan, but others- not so much! So, unless the collector is a thematic collector, I of course wouldn't send those to someone specifying 'no CTOs'.
I didn't think I had sent her any CTOs, so I was very surprised to get a 'neutral' rating and a rather terse PM on the subject. But I ALWAYS try to meet the receiver's wishes. I don't have a HUGE collection and I am doing my best to eliminate the CTOs.
So, how do tell for sure? I have some that are cancelled and appear to be in pristine or MINT condition, so I'm guessing they would be considered CTOs? But, is there a surefire way to tell that they have NOT been affixed to postage?
If a stamp has been gently removed from an envelope or paper, is there a way to see that it is not a CTO?
Being a thematic collector, I have no problem with CTOs or even definitives that fit my various collections. A stamp is a stamp is a stamp to me!
Thanks in advance for any input on how to spot them. I'm wanting everyone to be happy with my selection for them!
Christy aka pinkpolarbear