Used stamps exchanges.

Why ,,4,, ?

Because they are all CTO... cant you see??
:):):);):)

Look postally used to me and a nice selection at that. Of course if you don't collect Germany then yu might rate a 4 but if all rules of club are met then why not a 5?

@dubrava 4* is a positive rating for sending 100 (? didn't count them) different stamps in a good condition.

Maybe the question should be why not 5*?

Compared to others ( for example the 2 others I rated earlier today) this is not as good. I would have appreciated other/more countries. Germany like USA (or the Netherlands...) is a country most people already have a lot of stamps from and do not appreciate as much as other countries.
Looking at my profile I prefer to receive stamps from smaller countries. It's not that I exclude German stamps.
I would have appreciatied at least some effort, like the other 2 did today, to put in some other stamps. Maybe some stamps from the senders country.

But Dubrava what would be your rating and why?
And @francescpf what is your opinion?

....and it is not that I don't like the Germans, its also about the quality look at http://100stamps.club/stamps/DE-1355. That was a well deserved 5*

These exaggerated claims discourage other candidates.
See how the number of active members and exchanges decreases!

5*

5*

Would you like to make an effort preparing stamps and have 3 or 4 star in best case?

Io continuo a non capire perchè esistono le regole..... Le sole regole che sono scritte nella home page sono ****** 1)100 francobolli usati. 2) Francobolli unici, nessun doppio. 3) Francobolli in buone condizioni. 4)Puoi includere sorprese extra. ****Invece, mi sembra che esista solo la valutazione personale perchè non si riceveve quello che si desidera ( che non è regola scritta da nessuna parte ). Io spedisco anche CTO e definitivi ( sono comprati da enti filatelici o ricevuti da altri collezionisti ) penso di non aver spedito francobolli rotti o doppi ( se non per errore ) , e continuo a ricevere valutazioni neutre o negative. Penso che questo non sia giusto secondo queste regole scritte così. Penso che sarebbe utile aprire una discussione tra tutti e forse aggiungere qualche altra regola
Grazie, per avermi letto e scusate per lo sfogo.

spesso ricevo valutazioni neutre o negative, perchè cto e definitivi

If DE-1355 deserves a 5* rating, this one RU-1485 deserves it even more, after all there are no CTOs on the late selection, while there are some in the former.