Used stamps exchanges.

For some people it's never good: 110 stamps, so 10% to make up for any missed defects jsut in case, all pre 1990 as per the members wish and all flowers,animals, cartoons. I really spent some time to sort this out for him and then you get a 4 start rating! this sucks hard time and these kind of members make me sometimes think about quitting this club. I get dozens of unwanted stuff - cto, very commom defs etc - but give 5 star rating because the 100 different rule has been met, I only give 4 or 3 if there's more than 10 or so damaged. I do my very best to send good stuff according to peoples wishes. I never send cto, unless someone states he likes it because of motives and I only give definitives as extras. And this is the reward. I'm not the only one, he never ever has given 5 star, but I just had to share it. I'm over it now:-)

4* is a joke.
Saw also this one as an example http://100stamps.club/stamps/AT-236 also with a ridiculous 4*, and all the other ratings. Receiver is very picky. Does not appreciate when someone is really doing his/her best AND sends very good stamps.

@jeannette laat ajb je stemming niet door dit soort @#$%^& verpesten. Teveel mensen hier die WEL hun best doen en dat ook waarderen!

Dank voor de support; wees niet bang, ik ben er al overheen hoor, maar moest het even van me afschrijven. Je doet zo je best en dan dit, daar baalde ik echt even van. Maak nooit foto's van wat ik stuur maar omdat deze grapjas nog nooit een 5 had gegeven had ik dat wel even gedaan. (alleen een beetje vergeten te verkleinen ...)Ga gewoon vrolijk door en laat deze groep niet verpesten door 1 zo'n figuur. Ik denk dat hij t niet eens snapt:-)

You did right, Jeannette! This is a ***** lot. I had the same experience with this member.
Little by little I think, that maybe it is a wrong translation in his profile.

"I'd like to receive all kinds of new stamps(before 1990's, No CTO pls)."

Maybe he means "after 1990's"

maybe that explains why this member gives such a low rating, 3,6 average.